milisynergy.blogg.se - Emacs flag to open in terminal

Emacs flag to open in terminal how to#
Emacs flag to open in terminal manual#
Emacs flag to open in terminal free#

Some other useful variations and arguments are in the examples below.

Emacs flag to open in terminal free#

And feel free to jump right to the examples below to whet your appetite.įor this limited how-to, one interesting way to use the open command in this context is to use the option. I've printed most of the man page for the open command here for your perusal, but I'm not going to explore every argument.

Emacs flag to open in terminal manual#

Below is the manual page ("man" for short), shown by typing: man open The BSD UNIX command we'll be using is open. The terminal app is in the Utilities folder-which is found the Applications folder.

Emacs flag to open in terminal how to#

See, for example, " How to Find & Recover Missing Hard Drive Space." In that case, you must bypass the open command and drill into the Package Contents to run the app with sudo and admin privileges.

You want to quickly run a utility with admin privileges without the restriction of the account you're logged into.

You're writing, say, a Perl or Python script, for another user and, at some point in the script, you'd like to launch a GUI app that carries the workflow forward.

You're a UNIX professional, live and breathe the command line, but you'd rather use a GUI text editor for coding instead of the raw and ugly vi or Emacs editors.

The Finder acts up, a terminal window is already open, and you'd like to be able to launch a GUI app that might help you diagnose the problem.

However, it's so darn cool and charming that one just aches to use it at any opportunity.Īctually, upon reflection, there are some useful scenarios for this technique.

In my OS X career, I've only used this trick a handful of times. In this how-to I'll show you how to launch an OS X app from the command line with the open command.įirst off, I will admit this technique is fairly geeky. But with OS X and its Darwin core, there's often an elegant integration between the two. Once you find it, remove the keybinding.In some flavors of Unix, you feel as if you've been cast into an alternate universe when you open a terminal window and work on the command line. Go to Preferences -> Keymap and you can search for that shortcut key (tip: there's a way to search by actually typing in the shortcut key!).

In case the shortcut key doesn't do what you expect it is probably because it's assigned to something already in Keymap.

CMD + SHIFT + ] / CMD + SHIFT + [ to switch between the Terminal tabs.

ALT + F2 at some point later to re-open terminal (with existing tabs from before).

ALT + F2 twice to minimise terminal window, and go back automatically to editing file.

This allows you to hit ESC key and go back to the editor, same as it happens when you're navigating thru the project files. "Preferences > Tools > Terminal > Override IDE shortcuts" You need to disable the following checkbox from the IDE's settings: Just a quick note to mention that the solution provided by Oscar Reyes works! Right now it's just a mess of stuff like CTRL + TAB (which is not a solution because it's unpredictable: I want to press _ and go to where I expect, just like I can easily do with a mouse). There should be a single, predictable key combination that always takes me to the pane I want to go to (something mouse users take for granted).

It should be trivial for a Webstorm user to move from file1 file2 the terminal test results, etc. Programmers are at great risk of RSI, and avoiding the mouse is a key way to help prevent that. Honestly, in my opinion the keyboard navigation in WebStorm in general could use a revamp. and yet it can't handle one of the most basic tasks that at least half of all Node programmers are going to want to do? Write some code, run it at the command line, repeat is an extremely common workflow, and it should be trivial for WebStorm-users to accomplish it. I literally recommend it to my entire class of programming students. This omission is uncharacteristic for IntelliJ.